How To Read A Law Question Like An Examiner – AS Level Law 9084
Why Students Read Questions Wrong
- They read the story, not the legal triggers.
- They chase details that don’t matter.
- They miss hidden signals that examiners deliberately embed.
- They identify the wrong offence first → entire answer collapses.
- They don’t know the difference between “noise facts” and “mark-facts.”
- A* students read the question like an examiner, not like a story.
The Examiner Mindset (How They Want You To Read It)
- Examiners assume you will:
a. extract legal issues
b. ignore irrelevant fluff
c. match triggers to offences
d. break into elements
e. apply each element separately - They do not expect narrative.
- They do not want long openings.
- They want legal sequencing, not chronological storytelling.
The Hidden Pattern Behind Every Scenario
Every AS Law scenario follows this same structure:
- Setup — sets location, time, context
- Trigger Action — taking, pushing, entering, damaging
- Complication — victim reaction, chase, resistance
- Consequences — injury, damage, escape
- Motive/MR clue — intention, knowledge, purpose
- Ending — final impact
A* students recognise the structure instantly and pull out offences accordingly.
The Pattern in Table Form
| Scene Position | What It Normally Contains | What It Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Beginning | entering location | burglary / trespass / opportunity |
| Middle | taking property | theft |
| Middle | pushing, force | robbery |
| Middle–End | smashing, breaking | criminal damage |
| End | escape, reaction | causation |
| Final line | intent clue | mens rea |
Once you see this → the question becomes predictable.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change AS Level Law Free Material
The A 10-Second Scan Technique*
Before reading the full text, scan for:
1. Action Words
- “took”, “grabbed”, “removed”
- “pushed”, “hit”, “threatened”
- “entered”, “climbed”, “broke in”
- “smashed”, “destroyed”
- “ran”, “jumped”, “escaped”
2. Object Words
- “phone”, “bag”, “money”, “car” → property
- “window”, “door”, “shed”, “shop” → entry
- “glass”, “paint”, “display”, “lock” → damage
3. Reaction Words
- “victim panicked”, “jumped out”, “chased” → causation
Scanning reveals 80% of offences instantly.
A Trigger Word Decoder Table*
| Word / Phrase | Hidden Issue |
|---|---|
| “grabbed”, “picked up” | appropriation |
| “ran away with” | ITPD |
| “refused to pay” | dishonesty |
| “shoved”, “pushed”, “hit” | force (robbery) |
| “forcefully pulled bag” | Clouden (force on property) |
| “opened window”, “climbed through” | entry |
| “no permission”, “trespass” | Collins |
| “painted over” | criminal damage |
| “broke ankle while escaping” | Roberts (escape foreseeable) |
| “police shot by mistake” | Pagett |
| “refused medical treatment” | Blaue |
| “intended to…” | direct intent (Mohan) |
| “knew risk but continued” | recklessness (Cunningham/R v G) |
These keywords are the question.
Everything else is noise.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change AS Level Law Free Material
The Hidden “Offence Map” Examiners Use
Every scenario is built using a secret internal sequence.
It works like this:
Entry → Theft → Force → Damage → Result
Your job is to match each part to a legal topic.
The A Breakdown Step-by-Step*
STEP 1: Identify the Offence Category (ELS vs Criminal Law)
ELS = explanation questions
Signs:
- “Explain…”
- “Describe…”
- “Discuss advantages…”
- “Evaluate…”
Used for:
- statutory interpretation
- precedent
- delegated legislation
- law reform
- police powers
- civil/criminal courts
- ADR
Criminal = scenario questions
Signs:
- long story
- character names
- sequence of actions
- harm or property involved
Used for:
- theft
- robbery
- burglary
- criminal damage
- fraud
- causation
- mens rea
STEP 2: Identify WHETHER the Question Is a Single-Offence or Multi-Offence Scenario
Single Offence Indicators
- Short story
- One main action
- One moment of illegality
Multi-Offence Indicators
- More than one location
- Many actions
- Multiple victims
- Sequence of behaviours
- Entry + taking + force + damage
Most exam questions are multi-offence.
STEP 3: Convert The Story Into Chronological Legal Events
Use sub-points:
Example:
“Ahmed breaks window → enters shop → takes phones → pushes owner → smashes cabinet → owner breaks leg chasing him.”
Convert to legal chain:
- entry
- trespass
- intent
- appropriation
- property
- belonging
- dishonesty
- ITPD
- force
- timing
- purpose
- damage
- causation
This is how an examiner reads it.
STEP 4: Write the Offence List BEFORE Writing the Answer
A* students do:
- Offence 1: Burglary (entry, trespass, intent)
- Offence 2: Theft (5 elements)
- Offence 3: Robbery (force + theft)
- Offence 4: Criminal Damage
- Offence 5: Causation
Now the entire question is decoded.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change AS Level Law Free Material
STEP 5: Identify Which Parts Are “Noise”
Noise = facts that don’t affect legal issues:
Examples of noise:
- colour of bag
- time of day (unless burglary)
- description of clothing
- emotions of characters
- conversations that don’t change permission or MR
- irrelevant reasons/motives
- distances, speeds
Examiners include noise to distract weak students.
A* students ignore it instantly.
STEP 6: Identify the “Legal Gold” Facts
Gold facts = facts that create legal issues.
Gold Indicators
- movement (force)
- taking (appropriation)
- breaking (damage)
- entering (burglary)
- knowledge (MR)
- intent phrases
- possession references
- resistance/struggle (robbery)
- items removed (property)
- objects owned by others (belonging)
Strong students circle gold, ignore noise.
STEP 7: Identify Mens Rea Clues Hidden in Writing
Examiners hide MR in subtle wording.
Direct Intent Clues
- “He intended to…”
- “He aimed to…”
- “He planned to…”
Oblique Intent Clues
- “He knew the result was certain.”
- “He realised harm was inevitable.”
Recklessness Clues
- “He knew there was a risk but continued.”
- “He didn’t care about the outcome.”
- “He was aware… but carried on.”
These signals tell you which MR type to apply.
STEP 8: Use The Examiner “Reading Grid”
| Question Component | What It Means | What You MUST Do |
|---|---|---|
| Long narrative | noise + gold mixed | extract gold only |
| Action word | triggers offence | identify element |
| Object word | property/structure | classify under theft/damage |
| Resistance | force | robbery |
| Entry | trespass | burglary |
| Victim harm | causation | apply White/Roberts/Pagett |
| Intent clues | MR | use Mohan/Woollin/Cunningham |
The reading grid is exactly how examiners analyse your answer.
STEP 9: Use the “Hidden Cases Pattern”
Every scenario is built to invite specific cases.
Taking property → Morris/Hinks
Entry → Brown/Ryan
Permission → Collins
Force → Dawson & James / Clouden
Damage → Hardman
MR (recklessness) → Cunningham/R v G
Escape → Roberts
Third-party → Pagett
Thin skull → Blaue
A* students immediately know which case belongs to which trigger.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change AS Level Law Free Material
STEP 10: Recognise Question Type Based On Command Word
Explain / Describe
- AO1 heavy
- ELS topics
- No scenario analysis
Analyse / Advise / Apply
- AO2 heavy
- Requires MIRAC structure
- Offence breakdown
Discuss / Evaluate
- AO3 included
- Must include strengths + weaknesses
- Suitable for ELS or big 15-mark questions
A* students adjust automatically.
STEP 11: Recognise Hidden Expectations
Examiners expect:
- element-by-element
- short rules
- cases in brackets
- instant application
- micro-conclusions
- legal order (not narrative order)
Recognising this hidden expectation gives full marks.
STEP 12: Use The “Legal Order Reading System”
Convert chronological story into:
- entry
- trespass
- intent
- appropriation
- property
- belonging
- dishonesty
- ITPD
- force
- timing
- purpose
- damage
- causation
This is how the examiner wants your answer structured.
STEP 13: Spot Traps
Examiners include traps to punish careless readers.
Trap Examples
- “He returned the item later” → still ITPD possible
- “The victim ran by choice” → Roberts applies
- “The window was already open” → entry still counts
- “He used minimal force” → enough for robbery
- “He believed he had permission” → Jaggard lawful excuse
- “He took his own property left at shop” → Turner
- “The paint washed off” → still damage (Hardman)
A* students catch traps instantly.
STEP 14: Focus On LEGAL Sequence, Not STORY Sequence
Weak answer:
- explains what happened first → second → third
A* answer:
- offence 1
- offence 2
- offence 3
- offence 4
- offence 5
Sequencing transforms clarity → above-average marks instantly.
STEP 15: Build Your Own “Examiner Lens”
Ask yourself:
- “What offence does this fact trigger?”
- “Which element does this satisfy?”
- “Which case applies here?”
- “What MR clue is the examiner giving?”
- “What conclusion should I write?”
If you ask these while reading → you read like an examiner.
Final A Hidden Pattern Checklist*
- Read for legal triggers, not story
- Scan for action words
- Identify offences in 5–10 seconds
- Filter noise out
- Extract gold facts
- Convert into element list
- Use MIRAC per element
- Use short AO1
- Use one case per point
- Insert micro-conclusions
- Structure in legal order
- Recognise MR clues
- Catch traps
- Think like examiner → write like examiner → score like examiner
