Organisational Structure: Types Of Structure (Copy)
7.1 Organisational Structure
7.1.2 Types Of Structure: Functional, Hierarchical (Flat And Narrow), Matrix
Types Of Organisational Structure
- Functional structure
- Definition: A structure where the business is divided into departments based on functions such as marketing, finance, operations, and human resources.
- Features:
- Clear lines of authority within each department.
- Each department specialises in its own area.
- Employees report to functional managers.
- Advantages:
- Specialisation increases efficiency and expertise.
- Clear roles and responsibilities reduce confusion.
- Easier training and career progression within departments.
- Managers can focus on their area of expertise.
- Disadvantages:
- Can lead to poor communication between departments.
- Risk of “silos” where departments focus only on their own goals.
- Lack of coordination may delay decision-making.
- Employees may develop narrow skills instead of broader knowledge.
- Example: A bank with departments for loans, customer service, IT, and marketing.
- Hierarchical structure (tall/narrow)
- Definition: A structure with many layers of management and a narrow span of control (few subordinates per manager).
- Features:
- Clear chain of command.
- Communication flows from top to bottom.
- Managers supervise only a few employees each.
- Advantages:
- Clear reporting lines and accountability.
- Close supervision ensures tasks are done correctly.
- Easier monitoring and control.
- Disadvantages:
- Communication can be slow due to many layers.
- Risk of bureaucracy and inflexibility.
- Can demotivate employees due to lack of empowerment.
- Example: The military often uses tall hierarchical structures with many ranks.
- Hierarchical structure (flat/wide)
- Definition: A structure with fewer layers of management and a wide span of control (many subordinates per manager).
- Features:
- Fewer levels of hierarchy.
- Managers supervise many employees.
- Encourages delegation and empowerment.
- Advantages:
- Faster communication between managers and staff.
- Employees may feel more empowered and motivated.
- Less bureaucracy, more flexibility.
- Lower management costs.
- Disadvantages:
- Managers may become overloaded.
- Less close supervision may reduce control.
- Risk of confusion if roles are not clear.
- Example: Start-ups and small businesses often use flat structures.
- Matrix structure
- Definition: A structure where employees report to more than one manager, usually based on both function and project.
- Features:
- Teams are formed from different departments.
- Employees have dual reporting lines (to functional manager and project manager).
- Encourages collaboration across departments.
- Advantages:
- Encourages teamwork and sharing of expertise.
- Flexible and adaptable to changing projects.
- Improves innovation by combining different skills.
- Disadvantages:
- Can create confusion about authority.
- Risk of conflict between managers.
- Requires strong communication and coordination.
- Example: A construction company where engineers, architects, and finance staff work together on a single project team.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change A2 Level Business Full Scale Course
Why Some Organisations Are Structured By Product, Function Or Geographical Area
- By product
- Suitable for large businesses with diverse product lines.
- Each product line is treated as a separate division with its own resources.
- Example: Unilever divides its business into foods, beverages, and personal care.
- Advantage: Allows specialisation and focus on specific products.
- Disadvantage: Can duplicate resources across divisions, raising costs.
- By function
- Suitable for small to medium-sized firms or businesses producing a limited range of products.
- Departments are divided by business functions (marketing, HR, finance, operations).
- Advantage: Specialisation improves efficiency.
- Disadvantage: May reduce coordination between functions.
- By geographical area
- Suitable for multinational companies operating in different regions.
- Each region or country has its own operations and management.
- Example: McDonald’s has regional divisions (e.g., North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific).
- Advantage: Allows adaptation to local market needs.
- Disadvantage: May lead to duplication of resources and higher costs.
Reasons And Ways Structures Change
- Reasons for change
- Growth of business
- As businesses expand, more departments and managers are needed.
- A small start-up may evolve from a flat structure into a functional or divisional one.
- Expansion into new markets
- Entering new countries often requires a geographical structure.
- Allows adaptation to local legal and cultural differences.
- Product diversification
- Launching new products may lead to a product-based structure.
- Ensures each product receives enough focus.
- Technological changes
- New technologies may require new departments (e.g., digital marketing).
- Cost pressures
- Businesses may restructure to reduce costs (e.g., outsourcing, automation).
- Delayering
- Removing layers of management to reduce costs and speed up decision-making.
- Example: A retail chain reducing the number of regional managers.
- Mergers and acquisitions
- Combining two businesses often requires restructuring to integrate operations.
- Growth of business
- Ways structures change
- Delayering: Removing middle management layers to make the organisation flatter.
- Decentralisation: Giving more decision-making power to lower levels of management.
- Restructuring divisions: Creating new product or regional divisions.
- Outsourcing: Moving some functions outside the organisation.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change A2 Level Business Full Scale Course
Features Of A Formal Structure
- Levels of hierarchy
- Definition: The number of layers of management in an organisation.
- Tall structure = many levels, narrow spans of control.
- Flat structure = fewer levels, wider spans of control.
- Impact:
- More levels improve supervision but slow down communication.
- Fewer levels improve communication but may overload managers.
- Chain of command
- Definition: The line of authority through which instructions are passed down from top management to employees.
- Importance: Ensures clarity and accountability.
- Example: In a school, the principal → head of department → teachers → students.
- Span of control
- Definition: The number of employees directly managed by a supervisor.
- Narrow span: manager controls few employees → close supervision.
- Wide span: manager controls many employees → more delegation needed.
- Example: In a call centre, a supervisor may manage 20 agents (wide span). In a hospital, a senior surgeon may manage 3 junior doctors (narrow span).
- Responsibility
- Definition: The duty of an employee or manager to complete a task.
- Importance: Creates accountability and ensures tasks are completed effectively.
- Authority
- Definition: The right to give orders and make decisions.
- Delegated from top management down to subordinates.
- Example: A department manager has the authority to allocate tasks to staff.
- Delegation
- Definition: Passing authority to a subordinate while retaining overall responsibility.
- Advantages:
- Frees up managers’ time.
- Motivates employees by giving them responsibility.
- Risks:
- Tasks may not be completed properly.
- Some managers may be unwilling to delegate.
- Accountability
- Definition: The responsibility of an individual to justify their actions and decisions to their manager.
- Ensures managers and employees remain answerable for results.
- Centralised structure
- Definition: Decision-making is kept at the top levels of management.
- Advantages:
- Consistent decision-making across the organisation.
- Easier to maintain control.
- Disadvantages:
- Slow decision-making.
- Local managers may feel powerless.
- Example: McDonald’s uses a centralised structure for brand consistency.
- Decentralised structure
- Definition: Decision-making is delegated to lower levels of management.
- Advantages:
- Faster decision-making.
- Local managers can adapt to local conditions.
- Motivates employees by giving them more responsibility.
- Disadvantages:
- Decisions may be inconsistent across departments.
- Senior managers may lose control.
- Example: Multinational companies often decentralise decision-making to regional managers.
Diagram – Tall Vs Flat Structure
Tall (Narrow Span) Flat (Wide Span)
CEO CEO
| |
Manager Manager
| |---------------------
Supervisor | | | | |
| V V V V
Employee Emp Emp Emp Emp
- Tall: more levels, clear authority, slower communication.
- Flat: fewer levels, quicker communication, more responsibility for each manager.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change A2 Level Business Full Scale Course
Evaluating The Impact Of Competitors And Suppliers On Organisational Structure
- Competitors and structure
- High competition may encourage flat structures to allow faster decision-making.
- Low competition may allow tall structures with more control.
- Innovative industries may use matrix structures to share knowledge and respond quickly.
- Suppliers and structure
- Businesses with many suppliers may need a strong procurement or supply chain department (functional structure).
- Businesses dependent on global suppliers may use a geographical structure to manage local supply risks.
- Firms aiming for vertical integration may create new internal supply divisions.
Strategic Importance Of Organisational Structure
- Adapting to external changes
- Globalisation requires more geographical divisions.
- New technologies require changes in structure (e.g., adding IT departments).
- Improving efficiency
- Delayering reduces bureaucracy and speeds decision-making.
- Flat structures reduce costs but need capable managers.
- Enhancing competitiveness
- Matrix structures allow faster innovation to compete with rivals.
- Product structures ensure dedicated focus on different market segments.
- Supporting growth
- Start-ups may begin flat, then shift to functional or matrix as they grow.
- Large corporations often use a mix of structures (hybrid approach).
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia, World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 7 Distinctions and 11 World Records For Educate A Change A2 Level Business Full Scale Course
