Law Of Tort: Torts Affecting The Person: Battery: Definition And Elements Required To Establish Liability, Actionable Per Se (Copy) (Copy)
LAW OF TORT
TORTS AFFECTING THE PERSON
BATTERY
DEFINITION AND ELEMENTS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH LIABILITY; ACTIONABLE PER SE
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
INTRODUCTION TO BATTERY
Definition
• Battery is one of the trespass torts protecting a person’s bodily integrity.
• Battery occurs where the defendant intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful force directly to another person.
• Unlike assault, battery requires actual physical contact.
• The force used may be very slight.
Examination Definition
Battery may be defined as:
The intentional or reckless and direct application of unlawful force to another person without lawful justification.
Purpose Of Battery
The tort protects:
• Bodily integrity.
• Physical autonomy.
• Personal dignity.
• Freedom from unwanted physical contact.
Key Principle
• Every person’s body is inviolable.
• Any unlawful touching may amount to battery.
ACTIONABLE PER SE
Meaning
• Battery is actionable per se.
• The claimant does not need to prove damage.
• The claimant does not need to prove injury.
• The claimant does not need to prove financial loss.
Importance
• The tort is complete as soon as unlawful force is applied.
• Actual injury is unnecessary.
Why Is Battery Actionable Per Se?
• The law protects the right not to be touched unlawfully.
• The violation of that right itself justifies legal action.
Consequences
Claimant may succeed even where:
• No injury occurs.
• No bruising occurs.
• No medical treatment is required.
• No financial loss exists.
Examination Point
• The slightest unlawful touching may be sufficient.
ELEMENTS OF BATTERY
To establish battery the claimant must prove:
Element 1
• Application of force.
Element 2
• Direct interference.
Element 3
• Intention or recklessness.
Element 4
• Absence of lawful justification.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
ELEMENT 1
APPLICATION OF FORCE
General Rule
• Defendant must apply force to the claimant.
Meaning Of Force
• Force includes any physical contact.
• Force does not need to be violent.
• Force does not need to cause injury.
Very Slight Contact Is Sufficient
Examples
• Touching.
• Pushing.
• Spitting.
• Grabbing.
• Punching.
• Kicking.
Key Principle
Even the slightest touching may amount to battery.
LEADING CASE
Cole v Turner
Principle
• The least touching of another person in anger constitutes battery.
Significance
• Classic definition of battery.
Modern Position
• Battery extends beyond hostile touching.
• Hostility is not required.
LEADING CASE
Wilson v Pringle
Facts
• Schoolboy pulled another boy’s bag.
• Injury resulted.
Decision
• Battery possible.
Principle
• Hostility not essential.
Significance
• Modern authority.
FORCE MAY BE INDIRECT
General Rule
• Defendant need not touch claimant personally.
• Causing force to be applied may be sufficient.
Examples
Throwing An Object
• Object strikes claimant.
Pulling Away A Chair
• Claimant falls.
Setting A Trap
• Claimant injured.
LEADING CASE
Scott v Shepherd
Facts
• Defendant threw lit firework.
• Firework struck claimant.
Decision
• Battery established.
Principle
• Force may be applied indirectly.
Significance
• Important authority on indirect application of force.
CONTACT WITH CLOTHING OR OBJECTS
General Rule
• Force need not touch skin directly.
• Contact with items closely connected to the body is sufficient.
Examples
Clothing
• Pulling clothing.
Bag Being Carried
• Striking bag.
Cane Or Object Held
• Knocking object away.
LEADING CASE
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Facts
• Defendant drove car onto police officer’s foot.
Decision
• Battery established.
Principle
• Continuing contact may amount to battery.
Significance
• Important authority.
EVERYDAY CONTACT EXCEPTION
General Rule
• Not all physical contact amounts to battery.
Reason
• Ordinary life involves unavoidable touching.
Examples
• Crowded buses.
• Public transport.
• Queues.
• Sporting activities.
LEADING CASE
Collins v Wilcock
Facts
• Police officer grabbed claimant’s arm.
Decision
• Battery established.
Principle
• Everyday contact impliedly consented to.
• Contact beyond ordinary social interaction may amount to battery.
Significance
• Leading modern authority.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
ELEMENT 2
DIRECT INTERFERENCE
General Rule
• Battery requires direct application of force.
Meaning
• Force must directly result from defendant’s conduct.
Examples
Direct
• Punching.
• Kicking.
• Throwing object.
• Spitting.
Indirect But Still Direct In Law
• Pulling chair away.
• Setting mechanism in motion.
Difference From Negligence
Battery
• Direct interference.
Negligence
• Often indirect harm.
ELEMENT 3
INTENTION OR RECKLESSNESS
General Rule
• Defendant must act intentionally or recklessly.
Intention
Meaning
• Defendant intends physical contact.
Recklessness
Meaning
• Defendant realises risk of contact and proceeds anyway.
LEADING CASE
R v Venna
Principle
• Battery may be committed intentionally or recklessly.
Significance
• Important authority on mental element.
Important Examination Point
Defendant Need Not Intend Injury
• Intention to make contact sufficient.
ELEMENT 4
ABSENCE OF LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION
General Rule
• Contact must be unlawful.
Meaning
• No valid legal excuse exists.
Lawful Contact Includes
Consent
• Sporting activities.
• Medical treatment.
Self-Defence
• Reasonable force.
Lawful Arrest
• Reasonable force.
Necessity
• Emergency situations.
If Lawful Justification Exists
• Battery claim fails.
HOSTILITY
Historical Position
• Some older cases suggested hostility required.
Modern Position
Hostility Not Required
LEADING CASE
Wilson v Pringle
Principle
• Hostility not essential element.
Significance
• Modern law focuses on unlawful touching.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
SPECIAL FORMS OF BATTERY
SPITTING
General Rule
• Spitting constitutes battery.
Reason
• Physical contact occurs.
MEDICAL BATTERY
General Rule
• Medical treatment without valid consent may amount to battery.
LEADING CASE
Chatterton v Gerson
Principle
• Lack of consent may create battery.
Significance
• Important medical law authority.
CONTINUING ACTS
General Rule
• Continuing contact may amount to battery.
Authority
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Principle
• Continuing application of force sufficient.
COMPARISON WITH ASSAULT
| Assault | Battery |
|---|---|
| Threat of force | Actual force |
| No contact required | Contact required |
| Apprehension required | Contact required |
| Protects against anticipated violence | Protects against physical interference |
| Actionable per se | Actionable per se |
DEFENCES
CONSENT
Meaning
• Claimant agrees to contact.
Examples
• Sports.
• Surgery.
• Everyday physical interactions.
SELF-DEFENCE
General Rule
• Reasonable force may be used to protect oneself.
NECESSITY
Meaning
• Force used to prevent greater harm.
LAWFUL AUTHORITY
Examples
• Police powers.
• Statutory powers.
AO2 APPLICATION
Step 1
• Identify physical contact.
Step 2
• Determine whether force was applied.
Step 3
• Determine whether application was direct.
Step 4
• Assess intention or recklessness.
Step 5
• Consider lawful justification.
Step 6
• Reach conclusion.
AO3 EVALUATION
Strengths
Strong Protection
• Protects bodily integrity.
Actionable Per Se
• No injury required.
Flexible
• Covers many forms of interference.
Criticisms
Boundary Problems
• Distinguishing ordinary contact from battery.
Overlap
• Significant overlap with criminal law.
Uncertainty
• Some cases difficult to categorise.
EXAM QUICK REVISION SHEET
Definition
• Intentional or reckless direct application of unlawful force.
Elements
Force
• Cole v Turner
Indirect Force
• Scott v Shepherd
Everyday Contact
• Collins v Wilcock
Continuing Force
• Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Intention Or Recklessness
• R v Venna
Hostility Not Required
• Wilson v Pringle
Medical Battery
• Chatterton v Gerson
Examination Formula
Force
- Â
Direct Application
- Â
Intention Or Recklessness
- Â
No Lawful Justification
=
Battery
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
Written and Compiled By Sir Hunain Zia (AYLOTI), World Record Holder With 154 Total A Grades, 11 World Records and 7 Distinctions, Educate A Change.
